Table of Contents
The news that Mozambique had finally succeeded in convincing its creditors and reached an agreement to restructure a loan that has been crippling the small African country came as a sign of relief to many; but proceeding to consider the terms of the new agreement leaves a bitter taste in the mouth as there seem not to be a tangible improvement from the previous agreement which the southern African nation was unable to meet with.
It all began in 2013 when the country acquired a debt from the International lenders. Three years on, in 2016, the country contracted a bond issue, in the form of Eurobonds worth $726.5 million, to be repaid by 2023 at the latest.
According to the agreement, the loan acquired in 2016 was to be used in paying the previous loan gotten in 2013. This you will agree is a 'robbing Peter to pay Paul' approach which never really helps.
As expected, the country fell into a bad debt and was caught in the position of being unable to completely pay both the 2013 loan nor the 2016 bond. In 2017, the country had no other option but to cry out and admit that there was no way they could meet up with interest which the loans have accumulated. Interests which as at January 18, 2017 had risen to $59.7 million.
Since then the country had tried to reach an agreement with the creditors to restructure the debt terms which they finally have.
The African Exponent Weekly
Every week, get a digest of Top African News and Articles from The African Exponent.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
However, it appears that to clear its debt, Mozambique may have to borrow even more. These are the terms of the new agreement:
(a) It will issue a new, bigger loan: $900 million as against $726.5 million.
(b) But the repayment term is extended by 10 years from 2023 to 2033.
(c) The interest rate decreases to 5.8% from 10.5%.
Reacting to the new agreement, Ivone Soareso, leader of the parliamentary group of the opposition party Renamo in Mozambique expressed displeasure, saying:
“I also think that the banks have their share of responsibility. I am talking about Credit Suisse and VTB, which give money to African governments, to corrupt regimes in Africa, without really trying to find out if this money is being used for the benefit of the people of these countries, to contribute to the projects of this country, or if this money is being used for illegal purposes, for the private purposes of these leaders, or for inconceivable purposes.”
What are your thoughts on the new agreement?
Photo Credit: Fair Observer
Pro Tip: Crosswords
Solve crosswords on The African Exponent.
Next From Your Saved Articles
Log in or create an account to add articles to your saved articles list.
Related Articles
As institutions founded to rebuild the economies o…
The IMF wants the African nations to focus their r…
African nations are on the move to develop their c…
Ken Agyapong, a Ghanaian MP accused the World Bank…
"We think that debt has to be seen from the standp…
Most Read Articles
This hairstyle is steeped in the history of rebell…
It becomes clear that imperialism has resulted in …
Wondering whether you can have a website without p…
Here are some things to consider when looking for …
Want to study abroad but don't know which country …
More Articles
This has altered how we view, consume, and receive…
The company decided to aim its CSR contribution to…
Online casinos could soon become the fastest growi…
Find out what this gorgeous city has to offer thos…
All while doing what you can to save the planet!