Skip to content

The Day That Constitutionalism and The Rule of Law Officially Died In Burundi

Table of Contents

There are still African countries which are notorious when it comes to not upholding constitutional terms limits and amending constitutions so that the presidents get to stay in power for long. The desired system of checks and balances is eroded away and ultimately constititutions become mere tools that the presidents use to entrench their power. 

The situation is Burundi is a cause for concern for anyone who sees sense in upholding the rule of law and the separation of powers. Constitutions are meant to define where power lies, how it is exercised, who appoints those that exercise the power, who removes them, and circumstances in which they can be removed. Burundi's president Pierre Nkurunziza has sought to tilt the constitutional provisions in his favour. All he wants is to be in power for an excruciatingly long time. 

Recently a referendum was held in Burundi to bolster the moves to increase the powers of the president and to make provisions for two more terms. Nkurunziza's insatiable taste for power pushed this into happening and the percentage of those who voted "Yes" was 73%. One would be baffled why such a majority can approve such meaningless approach to governance but this can only be explained by the climate of fear and repression prevailing in Burundi. Only 19% voted "No" in the vote which scored a turnout of 96%. Spoiled ballots made up 4%of votes cast.

Nkurunziza is the latest in a long line of African leaders to tweak the constitution in order to stay in power, along with Rwanda's Paul Kagame, Uganda's Yoweri Museveni, Cameroon's Paul Biya and others.

What is evident in Burundi has been a gradual but powerful erosion of constitutionalism, only confirmed on the day of the referendum. This now means Nkurunziza now has a lot of powers and he will stay in office for much longer. The country's laws are weak and wide, the perfect concatenation of a repressive state. A presidential decree was issued earlier this month that anyone advising voters to boycott the vote risked up to three years in jail. Three years of intense crackdown on dissent, media and civil society have managed to cultivate an atmosphere of fear and people are willing to comply with the dictates of the regime. 

The African Exponent Weekly

Every week, get a digest of Top African News and Articles from The African Exponent.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

A majority turned out (a factor which dictators use to rally for legitimacy) but this can only be explained by what the opposition and rights groups say to be a climate of fear. Clearly, rule of law in Burundi is an elusive concept. The principle of separation of powers is very weakened as the executive, in the name of the president, is effectively ruling the country on decree, only using mechanisms like referendums to legitimise the decrees. 

"The electoral process has been neither free nor transparent, nor independent and still less democratic," former rebel leader and main opposition chief Agathon Rwasa said in a statement. "Burundi's referendum took place amid widespread abuse, fear, and pressure - a climate that is clearly not conducive to free choice," said Ida Sawyer, Central Africa director at Human Rights Watch (HRW).

Nkurunziza, 54, who has been in power since 2005, plunged his tiny east African nation into crisis in 2015 when he circumvented a constitutional two-term limit, arguing his first term came after an election by parliament.

What Nkurunziza has aimed towards is simply a concentration of powers in the president, something which betrays a repressive regime. In essence, there are no more limits to what Nkurunziza can do. There is a deplorable degradation of the minimum standards of justice and fairness in the country, and because Nkurunziza is now obsessed with keeping his tight grip on power, the proliferation of arbitrary judgments will become repulsing. 

That constitutionalism has died in Burundi is no longer a secret, for it has been ratified by a coerced population for the world to see. It is worrying. It only puts a retrogressive tag on the politics of Africa, despite spirited efforts being made to encourage good practices of governance. 

Pro Tip: Become a Blogger

Publish your own articles by creating your blog on The African Exponent. More info

Topics:
Share this article
Are you impressed, have any concerns, or think we can improve this article? Email us.
Follow us on social media and rss.

Next From Your Saved Articles

Log in or create an account to add articles to your saved articles list.

Related Articles

Critics have accused the government of insensitivi…

Jan 23rd

Foreign concepts should not be adopted with blind …

Jan 7th

The first lady in her song urged couples not to fi…

Oct 28th

Muammar Gaddafi's vision for a United States of Af…

Aug 25th

They first came for Kenyans, then Ghanaians, Congo…

Jul 24th

Most Read Articles

1.

This hairstyle is steeped in the history of rebell…

Sep 28th
2.

It becomes clear that imperialism has resulted in …

Oct 2nd
3.

Akufo-Addo’s personal connections to the Agyapa de…

Oct 7th
4.

There is not enough current to trip a circuit brea…

Oct 3rd
5.

The convenience offered by online sites makes it e…

Oct 2nd

More Articles

Africans can collectively succeed if there is cros…

Sep 23rd

Seven tips for making money on ICO investments.

Sep 22nd

This article will act as a guide for people who wi…

Sep 21st

Many people do not know the history behind it or t…

Sep 21st

Africa did not completely change the political lan…

Sep 21st

Explore

Explore Articles

Copyright © The African Exponent. All rights reserved.

Comments

Latest